TOPICS

Curcumin A Contact Allergen

Soham P. Chaudhari, DO; Alison Y. Tam, DO; Jason A. Barr, DO

Authors: Dr. Chaudhari is PGY1 TRI Resident Physician, Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, New Jersey; Dr. Tam is Department Chair for Department of Mohs Surgery, Anson, Edwards & Higgins Plastic Surgery Associates, Las Vegas, Nevada; Dr. Barr is Dermatology Residency Program Director, Affiliated Dermatology, Anthem, Arizona. Disclosures: The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.


Abstract

Background: Herbal medicines are used by thousands of patients all over the world. However, they can often cause adverse effects. Turmeric, made from the root of Curcuma longa, is a yellow spice used throughout South Asia for its flavor as well as for its medicinal properties. Curcumin is the main ingredient in turmeric. It is known for downregulating the expression of various proinflammatory cytokines and has been studied for its anti-inflammatory mechanism. However, it has also been reported to cause contact dermatitis. Kumkum, a turmeric-based powder applied by Hindu women on their foreheads, has also been found as an allergen. Objective: The authors have reviewed the anti-inflammatory properties of curcumin and reports of contact dermatitis to understand the possible harmful effects of this commonly used spice, while also examining its beneficial role in dermatologic conditions. They aim to increase awareness regarding this common herb and its prevalent use not only in South Asia, but also in North America. Methods: A thorough literature search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies that examined the anti-inflammatory role of curcumin and its role in contact dermatitis. Results: Eleven studies demonstrate that although curcumin does have anti-inflammatory properties, it is an allergen. Conclusion: Curcumin has many valuable properties that can be exploited to treat dermatologic conditions. However, patients and dermatologists must be keen of possible allergic reactions. Further studies are needed to completely understand this widely used herb and its efficacy in dermatology.


Introduction

The rhizomes of Curcuma longa L., from the family Zingiberaceae, are the source of turmeric, which has been used for centuries as an herbal medicine, a spice in cooking, in cosmetics, and as a dye. The scalded and dried rhizome provides the crude drug Rhizoma Curcumae Longae, otherwise known as turmeric root.[1],[2] As an herbal medicine, it has been used to treat inflammatory processes, liver disorders, dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, infections, mycoses, wounds, and skin disorders. The Community herbal monograph[3] recognizes only the traditional use of various herbal preparations of turmeric in solid or liquid dosage forms administered orally to increase bile flow for the relief of symptoms of indigestion (such as sensation of fullness, flatulence, and slow digestion). No dermatological uses are recognized. However, turmeric has been recorded as being applied topically for the treatment of acne, wounds, boils, bruises, blistering, ulcers, eczema, insect bites, parasitic infections, hemorrhages, and skin diseases, such as herpes zoster and pemphigus.[3] The curcuminoids contained in the rhizome, which confer a yellow color to turmeric, comprise a mixture of curcumin (also known as diferuloylmethane, Natural Yellow 3, and E100), demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin. Curcumin makes up about 90 percent of the curcuminoid content. The rhizome also yields volatile oil and oleoresin, comprising zingiberene, aromatic curcumene, aromatic turmerone, ?-turmerone, ?-turmerone, ?-santalene, and other monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes.[1],[4] Chemical reduction of the mixture of curcuminoids found in turmeric produces a colorless material comprising a mixture of tetrahydrocurcuminoids. This semi-synthetic material is included in some cosmetic products as an antioxidant ingredient. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and its animal model, contact hypersensitivity (CHS), are T cell-mediated inflammatory skin diseases induced by contact allergens. Though numerous cellular and molecular players are known, the mechanism of chemical-induced sensitization remains poorly understood. Recent data identify neutrophils to be critically involved in both the sensitization and elicitation phase of CHS.[5] Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interferon (IFN)-gamma induce expression of interleukin (IL)-33, and IL-33 produced by keratinocytes contributes to ACD.[6] Blockade of IL-33, TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma could represent novel and potent strategies to treat ACD. Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is an eczematous reaction to toxic chemicals contacting the skin and is the most common form of contact dermatitis. It is recognized that irritancy does not represent a single monomorphous entity, but rather a complex biologic syndrome with diverse pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. The clinical presentation is highly variable depending on several factors, including properties and strength of the irritant, dose, duration and frequency of exposure, environmental factors, and skin susceptibility. The pathophysiological mechanism depends on activation of the innate immune system and involves skin barrier disruption, cellular changes, and release of proinflammatory mediators that directly recruit and activate T lymphocytes. The diagnosis of ICD is often clinical and involves a comprehensive history and examination as well as the exclusion of ACD with patch testing.

Methods

A thorough literature search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies that examined the anti-inflammatory role of curcumin and its role in contact dermatitis. No limitations were placed on year or type of study. Only articles in English were included. Search terms used were Ayurveda contact dermatitis, turmeric contact dermatitis, and curcumin contact dermatitis. This revealed a total of 89 articles. After duplicates were removed, 35 articles remained. Titles and abstracts were screened for those articles with studies pertaining to contact dermatitis, while those that examined only the molecular mechanisms were excluded. The final analysis included 11 studies.

Results

Curcumin suppresses pro-inflammatory pathways.[7],[8] It inhibits the expression of TNF-alpha induced IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, cyclin E, mitogen-activated protein kinases (JNK, p38 MAPK, and ERK), and NF-kappaB in HaCaT cells.[9] It can also reverse the anti-apoptotic function of TNF-alpha in skin cells. Curcumin also inhibits phosphorylase kinase activity.[10],[11] PhK integrates multiple signaling pathways and couples these pathways to glycogenolysis and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent phosphorylation to ensure a continuous energy supply for cell function. It is activated by glycogen phosphorylase and inhibited by glycogen synthase in glycogenolysis; it provides essential energy for producing high-energy phosphate bonds in reactions involving proteins as well as transferring phosphate bonds from ATP to activate phosphorylase-b. Although it is known to be abundant mostly in muscle, this enzyme is also involved in regulating calcium-dependent phosphorylation events in the epidermis.[7] Many cases of contact dermatitis caused by curcumin have previously been reported (Table 1 and Table 1 Part 2). Goh et al[12] described a spice miller who developed dermatitis on the hands caused by curry powder and Curcuma longa; he had a positive patch test to Curcuma longa 25%in petrolatum.[12] Hata et al[13] described a woman who developed erythema, papules, and vesicles on the dorsa of her hands after applying a medicament containing Curcuma longa on the skin. She had positive patch tests to curcumin 1%, 0.5%, and 0.1% in petrolatum. Kiec-Swierczynska et al[14] described a pasta worker who developed acute contact dermatitis of the hands and forearms due to the yellow color, curcumin, in the pasta that she handled. She had positive patch tests to curcumin 1%, 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.001% in petrolatum. Two cases of contact urticaria caused by turmeric have also been reported, again in an occupational exposure context.[15] One case appeared to have a nonimmunological etiology and the other an immunological etiology. Chemical reduction of the mixture of curcuminoids found in turmeric produces a colorless material comprising a mixture of tetrahydrocurcuminoids. This semi-synthetic material is included in some cosmetic products as an antioxidant ingredient. Two cases of contact allergy to this material in the United Kingdom following the use of a sunblock cream have been confirmed by patch testing.[16],[17]

Discussion

Typically, kumkum is used by women of Hindu Indian origin as a mark of their marital status.[18–21] Interestingly, however, men formed a significant proportion (16?46; 34.8%) of cases with kumkum-induced dermatitis in a study by Nath et al.[23] CD to kumkum is typically localized to the site of application; however, the surrounding skin may be involved if the kumkum trickles down the skin in sweat.[18],[20–22] Kumkum can produce both allergic and pigmented CD. In a study by Nath et al, allergic CD to kumkum was seen in 11 out of 46 patients (23.9%).[23] The term “pigmented contact dermatitis” was introduced by Osmundsen in 1970 to explain the pigmentation that followed CD; however, the dermatitis may not be clinically overt and hyper- or hypo-pigmentation may be the only visible symptom of a contact allergy.[24] Kumkum is emerging as an important cause of pigmented CD, with several recent reports.[1],[4] It appears that only “red kumkum” can sensitize and cause pigmented CD.[18] The reason might be that red kumkum is more commonly used than other colored kumkum formulations, and that probably only red kumkum contains a high percentage of the sensitizers that cause pigmented CD.18 Commercially prepared kumkum is colored with azo dyes, and this can cause pigmented CD.20 Kumkum is also known to contain the dye Brilliant Lake Red R,1,3 which has been implicated in pigmented CD.[25] In south Indian states, kumkum is prepared at home by alkalizing pure turmeric powder, but commercial kumkum is used more often nowadays.19 The exact composition of commercially available kumkum is not known, but it contains starch or chalk powder colored with various azo dyes.[18],[20] Other known components in commercial kumkum include various other dyes (coal tar dyes, toluidine red, erythrosine, and lithol red calcium salt), eight fragrances, groundnut oil, tragacanth gum, tumeric powder, parabens, and canaga oil.[18],[21] Goh et al[18] reported positive reactions with Brilliant Lake Red R, Sudan I, and aminoazobenzene and canaga oil in patients with kumkum-induced dermatitis. Laxmisha et al[26] reported positive patch test reactions to thimerosal and gallate mix in kumkum-induced dermatitis. Thimerosal is widely used as a preservative in vaccines, eye medications, contact-lens solutions, solutions for intracutaneous skin testing, immunoglobulin preparations, and cosmetics.[27] Sensitization can occur in childhood due to vaccination.[27] Hence, a positive patch test reaction should be evaluated with care.[27] In a study by Nath et al,[23] patients with kumkum-induced dermatoses showed positive allergic reactions to thimerosal (18?25 patients), gallate mix (12?25), and PPD, Kathon CG, benzotriazol, tert-butyl hydroquinone, and parabens [one patient (4%) each].[21] The positive reaction to PPD can be explained by cross reactivity to azo dyes, which may be present in commercial kumkum.

Conclusion

Hypersensitivity, type 1 allergy, to spices is common but type 4 allergy is rare. Curcumin has many valuable properties that have been exploited to treat dermatologic conditions. However, it can serve as a contact allergen. Further studies are needed to completely understand this widely used herb, its mechanism of action, efficacy in dermatology, and possible allergic reactions.

References

1. Knoss W, Chinou I. Regulation of medicinal plants for public health—European community monographs on herbal substances. Planta Med. 2012;78:1311–1316.

2. Knoss W, Stolte F, Reh K. [The regulatory framework for comple-mentary and alternative medicines in Europe]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesund heitsfor schung Gesund-heitsschutz. 2008;51:771–778.

3. Peschel W. The use of community herbal monographs to facilitate registrations and authorisations of herbal medicinal products in the European Union 2004-2012. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;158 Pt B: 471–486.

4. Singh G, Kapoor IP, Singh P, et al. Comparative study of chemical composition and anti-oxidant activity of fresh and dry rhizomes of turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn.). Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48:1026–1031.

5. Weber FC, Nemeth T, Csepregi JZ, et al. Neutrophils are required for both the sensitization and elicitation phase of contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 2015;212:15–22.

6. Taniguchi K, Yamamoto S, Hitomi E, et al. Interleukin 33 is induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon gamma in keratinocytes and contributes to allergic contact dermatitis. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2013;23: 428–434.

7. Heng MC, Song MK, Harker J, et al. Drug-induced suppression of phosphorylase kinase activity correlates with resolution of psoriasis as assessed by clinical, histological and immunohistochemical parameters. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143: 937–949.

8. Kurd SK, Smith N, VanVoorhees A, et al. Oral curcumin in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris: A prospective clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:625–631.

9. Grant KL, Schneider CD. Turmeric. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000;57: 1121–1122.

10. Ireson CR, Jones DJ, Orr S, et al. Metabolism of the cancer chemopreventive agent curcumin in human and rat intestine. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:105–111.

11. Reddy S, Aggarwal BB. Curcumin is a non-competitive and selective inhibitor of phosphorylase kinase. FEBS Lett. 1994;341:19–22.

12. Goh CL, Ng SK. Allergic contact dermatitis to Curcuma longa (turmeric). Contact Dermatitis. 1987;17:186.

13. Hata M, Sasaki E, Ota M, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from curcumin (turmeric). Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36:107–108.

14. Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to curcumin food colour in a pasta factory worker. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;39:30–31.

15. Liddle M, Hull C, Liu C, et al. Contact urticaria from curcumin. Dermatitis. 2006;17: 196–197.

16. Thompson DA, Tan BB. Tetrahydra-curcumin-related allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(4):254–255.

17. Lamb SR, Wilkinson SM. Contact allergy to tetrahydrocurcumin. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;48(4):227.

18. Goh CL, Kozuka T. Pigmented contact dermatitis from “kumkum.” Clin Exp Dermatol. 1986;11(6): 03–606.

19. Pasricha JS, Khaitan BK, Dash S. Pigmentary disorders in India. Dermatol Clin. 2007;25(3):343–352, viii.

20. Kumar AS, Pandhi RK, Bhutani LK. Bindi dermatoses. Int J Dermatol. 1986;25(7):434–435.

21. Kumar JV, Moideen R, Murugesh SB. Contactants in “Kum-Kum” derm-atitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1996;62(4):220–221.

22. Mehta SS, Reddy BS. Pattern of cosmetic sensitivity in Indian patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45(5):292–293.

23. Nath AK, Thappa DM. Kumkum-induced dermatitis: an analysis of 46 cases. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007;32(4):385–387.

24. Osmundsen PE. Pigmented contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1970;83(2): 296–301.

25. Baxter KF, Wilkinson SM. Contact dermatitis from a nickel-containing bindi. Contact Dermatitis. 2002; 47(1):55.

26. Laxmisha C, Nath AK, Thappa DM. Bindi dermatitis due to thimerosal and gallate mix. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(10): 1370–1372.

27. Warshaw EM, Buchholz HJ, Belsito DV, et al. Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001–2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(1):23–38.

28. Fischer LA, Agner T. Curcumin allergy in relation to yellow chlorhexidine solution used for skin disinfection prior to surgery. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51(1):39–40.

29. Futrell JM, Rietschel RL. Spice allergy evaluated by results of patch tests. Cutis. 1993;52(5):288–290.

30. Sundaram M. Vermilion hypo-pigmentation at an unusual site. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62(1): 58–59.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn