Stephanie D. Gan, MD; Emmy M. Graber, MD, MBA
To the editor: Acne is one of the most common skin diseases, affecting more than 90 percent of adolescents. The severity of acne in adolescents increases with advancing maturity through the teenage years. Although the prevalence and severity of acne scarring in the population is not well-documented, the available literature is usually correlated to the severity of acne.
Acne scars can present with varying morphologies. One morphologic acne scar classification system includes three main types of scars: ice pick, rolling, and boxcar. Some have also used the term atrophic scars as a distinct entity or as an all-encompassing term to refer to these types of scars.[5 ]Other less common scars include sinus tracts, hypertrophic scars, and keloidal scars. Precise identification of the scar subtype is important in guiding therapeutic management.
Herein, the authors would like to expand the acne scar classification system by adding papular scars to the existing dermatologic lexicon of ice pick, rolling, and boxcar scars (Figure 1). Papular scars are 3 to 4mm skin-colored cobblestone-like papules distributed anywhere on the body but, in our clinical experience, most commonly on the chin (Figure 2), nose, and back. Also known as white papular acne scars, these flesh-colored papules are often incorrectly diagnosed as acne and do not respond to traditional acne treatments. Histologically, dermal fibrosis consistent with scar is present (Figure 3).
Papular scars can clinically mimic closed comedones, acne, and granulomas, leading to an unnecessary delay in appropriate treatment. Active acneiform lesions causing any type of scars should be treated aggressively with systemic therapy to prevent further progression of scarring.
A more specific and broader classification system is important not only for obtaining an accurate clinical examination, but also for designing targeted studies and treatment protocols for papular scars. Knowledge of this newly described type of acne scar aids in preventing a misdiagnosis of acne and guides appropriate scar-directed management. Future research should be directed toward comparative studies of scar treatments, such as subcision, punch excision, punch elevation, chemical peels, and lasers to determine the most effective approach to treating this newly classified scar subtype.
1. Ghodsi SZ, Orawa H, Zouboulis CC. Prevalence, severity, and severity risk factors of acne in high school pupils: a community-based study. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:2136–2141.
2. Bhate K, Williams HC. Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:474–485.
3. Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:303–308.
4. Jacob CI, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment options. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:109–117.
5. Alster TS, West TB. Treatment of scars: a review. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39:418–432.